(The following is part of the Adventure-a-Thon hosted by the friendly folks at Cinematic Catharsis and Realweegiemidget Reviews)
Tarzan’s New York Adventure (1942) is a movie of milestones: the final MGM Tarzan film before the franchise moved to RKO and Maureen O’Sullivan’s last appearance as Jane. It has a lot more going for it as well.
![]() |
But Boy is fascinated
with this visit from the outside world and despite Tarzan’s warnings, goes out
to the plane. Bickford sees Boy as the ultimate circus attraction and under the
distraction of an attack from local natives who trap Tarzan and Jane in a brushfire,
kidnaps him, the plane miraculously taking off out of the jungle without benefit
of a runway.
Desperate to
find Boy, Tarzan and Jane trek across Africa to the nearest city where they
learn that the plane’s destination is New York City. Paying in gold nuggets,
they trade their loincloths for tailored clothes and leave for America, Weissmuller’s
shoulders even more impressive in a double-breasted suit.
The “stone
jungle” they encounter is the 1940s Hollywood vision of Manhattan: swanky
nightclubs, people employed in jobs that barely exist today, like taxi drivers,
or not at all: bellhops, cigarette girls, hat-check attendants. All that’s
missing is a reference to the Brooklyn Dodgers. Jane takes charge and helps
Tarzan navigate through modern conveniences like radios, mirrors, telephones
and, memorably, walk-in showers.
![]() |
The other
fish out of water is Cheeta, who adapts to city life easily and gets plenty of
screentime, including a “soliloquy” running amuck in a hotel room. Based on her
performance, I would have supported the superstar chimp’s nomination for Best
Supporting Actress.
Tarzan and
Jane’s attempt to get Boy back through the legal system hits a roadblock when
Jane admits under oath that she and Tarzan are not his true parents. Tarzan,
chafing from that suit and from listening to lawyers, chooses jungle justice over
a Kramer vs. Kramer custody battle.
Tarzan breaks free from the courthouse, and leads the police on a one-sided, if exciting, rooftop chase, a daring climb up the cables of the Brooklyn Bridge and a death-defying 200-foot plunge into the East River.
(Some online
swear Weissmuller really took that leap – pure suicide in reality – when it was
all done with rear projection, editing and a dummy tossed into an MGM water
tank. The bigger question is how did Tarzan figure out he was swimming toward
Long Island, where Boy was being held, and didn’t wind up in Jersey City?)
A group of
circus roustabouts (including Elmo Lincoln, who played Tarzan in three silent
films) overtake Tarzan and lock him in a lion cage. But with the help of a herd
of circus elephants, wise in the universal animal language spoken by Tarzan, he
defeats the bad guys and gets Boy back.
Placing
Tarzan outside of his world provides context for him to explain the unspoken philosophy
of the jungle: “Jungle laws easy. In jungle, man only kill bad animals. In
civilization, men kill good men,” a message that may have resonated with
audiences in May 1942 when the movie was released, America having entered World
War II just a few months before.
Tarzan movies
will always be subject to modern-day criticisms about racial and gender
stereotypes, but at the same time, viewing this film made more than 80 years
ago reveals a progressive tale about the power within non-traditional families,
bound not by blood, but by love and commitment to each other.
![]() |
As with the movie, Cheeta gets the last word |
I remember watching these Tarzan films on telly when I was wee, but dont remember this one - this sounds much more fun and a great fish out of water tale. Thanks for bringing this to the blogathon and just added you to Day 1, do remember to send your post link to Barry and check out his competition....
ReplyDeleteThanks, Gill!
DeleteI do remember seeing this as a kid—always enjoyed Tarzan movies and Johnny Weissmuller was the best. The series went downhill after the wonderful Maureen O'Sullivan left—I need to see this, her last appearance, again soon! Great post!
ReplyDelete-Chris
Chris, Yes, the series began to slip once O'Sullivan left, Weissmuller's Tarzan just wasn't the same without her.
DeleteOne day I plan to devour all the Tarzan films starting from the very beginning. How fun would that be?! I have never seen this film and I love watching movies that have New York as one of its characters. As a native NYer I cannot help but love seeing my city and state shine in movies :) Super fun post!! :)
ReplyDeleteThanks. Manhattan is just as much a character in this movie as the rest of the cast.
DeleteI love your take on this as a progressive salute to the power of true love and commitment over blind legalisms and stultifying bureaucracy. Of course as a kid watching it for the first time, I was laughing at all of Tarzan's clumsy attempts to deal with "civilization." This was a watershed movie, and as others have commented, Maureen O'Sullivan's absence was glaring in the Tarzans that followed.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Brian. The studio brought in various "jungle princesses" and sometimes a woman from civilization to play off Tarzan but it never worked as well as it did with Jane.
ReplyDeleteYou couldn't have picked a better subject for an Adventure-a-Thon post! Those Weissmuller-starring Tarzan films were some of the greatest escapist fun the movies ever offered. This final MGM film of the Weissmuller series often seems to be treated like Tarzan had overstayed his welcome at the studio just because of the story's change of locale and the resulting humor. I think it reinforces just how unique a character Johnny Weissmuller's Tarzan was.
ReplyDeleteThanks. The drop in quality (and budget) when the franchise left for RKO is apparent, but those first MGM Tarzan movies are all terrific.
ReplyDeleteI grew up seeing the Weissmuller Tarzans shown on British TV at weekends, and you sum up the importance of family and connection in them very well here! Thank you for posting! Mary, @ https://tigerheartstales.wordpress.com.
ReplyDeleteThanks for taking the time to read my review!
DeleteYour enjoyment of this film really shines through! I’ve Seen various Tarzan films, but I have not seen his New York adventure! From your description, it sounds like a thrilling adventure with some humor and perhaps something to think about in the end.
ReplyDeleteThanks. It's a movie worth tracking down.
ReplyDeleteI've actually seen that stuff about Weissmuller taking that plunge off the bridge. Not a flippin' chance...
ReplyDeleteImagine the studio allowing one of their top attractions to endanger himself like that.
ReplyDeleteThis movie looks like pure fun. Admittedly, I haven't seen any of the Weissmuller Tarzan movies, but based on your terrific review, I hope to remedy that. Thanks for joining the blogathon!
ReplyDeleteBarry, thanks for hosting.
ReplyDeleteIt's always fun when the fish-out-of-water stories reverse roles.
ReplyDelete